• Hi, konnte jmd. bitte mein Text kurz schauen, ob Zusammenhänge klar zu sehen sind. Danke im Voraus

    Nowadays, global warming and other environmental problems have made us all more environmentally conscious than we used to be 20 or even 10 years ago. This consensus has become so great and far reaching that the idea of going “green” has even found its way into big business. Green housing, green transportation, green living in general and all the needed accessories to realize it, all seem to be finding their way into the corporate world as the next big growth market. In fact, it is sure that the whole industry and the government that has sprung up around "green" in response to the threat of climate change is nothing more than a "phase", and that climate change is, in reality, an advertising ploy. There is definitely money to be made in the green sector. The goal is obviously to encourage public to continue to use products and support companies that cause environmental damage, in the belief that the problem is being “taken care of”. As same the political party has their own aim to sounds political attractive. They want to recycle all its trash not because it necessarily makes environmental or economic sense but because the goal of “zero waste”. It can be clearly seen by launching of nuclear power. Although, nuclear power may not produce greenhouse gases, but it is unacceptable in almost every other respect: environmentally, economically and in term of risks. It produces radioactive waste which is highly dangerous. Furthermore, if included in the overall bill, the cost of disposing the waste safely cancels out the cost benefits of cheap generation. Waste is an enormous problem. Because the cost of replacing computers, mobile phones and other gadgets is going down, and technology is going out of date more quickly, more and more devices are ending up in landfills. The amount of e-waste is rising three times faster than any other form of household waste and if it is not disposed of properly, toxic substances can leak out into the soil and water, harming the local environment and people’s health. Therefore, there is an acute action needed and the government should now behave in an environmentally responsible manner. They are capable to oblige people who create waste to clean up after themselves and ensure that the price of any product reflects the cost of disposing of it safely. That would help to signal which items are hardest to get rid of, giving consumers an incentive to buy goods that create less waste in the first place. Waste also presents an opportunity in a grander sense, as potential resource. The duty of government should be promoting firms who see a future in which things like household rubbish will provide the fuel for cars and homes, doing away with the need for dirty fossil fuels.

  • I don't understand your posting this essay here after you have already got a positive statement by "Luschen" :

    Zitat

    i, I thought this was a very good essay. Make sure to separate your essay into paragraphs, because I couldn't clearly tell what your thesis was and what your main points were. Your writing was very good though, only a few grammatical errors. I would rate this essay a 4 out of 5.

    http://www.english-test.net/forum/ftopic87877.html

    Ich habe mir mal spasseshalber vier zufällig ausgewählte Doppelzeilen "deiner" Arbeit bei google eingegeben mit dem folgenden Ergebnis.

    They want to recycle all its trash not because it necessarily makes environmental or economic sense but because the goal of “zero waste”.
    http://www.economist.com/node/13135349?story_id=E1_TPTPVPQJ

    whole industry and the government that has sprung up around "green" in response to the threat of climate change is nothing more than a "phase",
    http://www.helium.com/items/1201509-…ge-and-security

    Although, nuclear power may not produce greenhouse gases, but it is unacceptable in almost every other respect: environmentally, economically and in term of risks
    http://www.nuclear.com/archive/2004/05/29/tbd

    The amount of e-waste is rising three times faster than any other form of household waste and if it is not disposed of properly, toxic substances can leak out into the soil and water, harming the local environment and people’s health.

    http://www.medicineandbiotech.com/health.html
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/INESAP/m…92?xm=1&m=e&l=1

    Alle Zitate aus "deiner" Arbeit waren wortwörtlich aus verschiedenen Aufsätzen kopiert!!

    Herzlichen Glückwunsch, du hast dir die Freinherr-von-und-zu-Guttenberg-Verdienst-Medaille mit Auszeichnung verdient:

    DÜMMER kann man nicht sein.

    Einmal editiert, zuletzt von what'sup (20. März 2012 um 08:35)

  • pfff... wen kümmert es???... tsss...und vor allem habe ich nicht vor diesen Text zu veröffentlichen. Er soll nur als zusammen gefasste Information dienen. Hast wohl ganze Zeit nicht zu tun oder? gul

  • Laß es Dir eine Warnung sein. Ich kenne persönlich mehrere Leute, die sich Abschlußarbeiten diesbezüglich sehr genau ansehen. Und das ist richtig so.