Death Penality Comment überprüfen bitte

    Muss den comment morgen abgeben, wäre nett wenn es jemand vorher korregieren könnte.

    This is going to be a comment on the question wether death penality is a necessary way of punishment in the 21. century.

    Many people looking for total safty and accept the capital punishment as an alternate option to get free of murders and rapists.
    It is true that the hard punishment of goverments law is a warning for potential criminals but it is also fact that many murders don't calculate the consequences of their doing.
    Many of them are on the influence of drugs or on the search for money to pay for their drug addiction. This persons are sick in their mind and must get a psychological therapie and maybe they can have a normal life after 15 years prison instead of killing them.
    If the goverment kills a people they swap the position with the offender which commitet a murder. They aren't better as a murder and acting as an instrument of vengeance.
    Furthermore is their a high risk of killing an innocent person. Punishing a person to death row is mostly a final decision which can't be removed after initiatng the death injection.

    Of course I can understand the wish for revenge by a murdered childs mother but we can't use practices from middle ages in our century.
    I think that a life in prison is more effective and for most people even harder then to get killed by the law.
    It's not the way of a democratic nation to retaliate in kind. It would mean to be on the same level with the offender.
    We can not rape a rapist or hurt some one in the case of injury so why we should kill a murder?

    Many people are looking for total safety and accept the capital punishment as an alternate option to get free of murders and rapists.
    It is true that the hard punishment by law is a warning for potential criminals but it is also a fact that many murders don't calculate the consequences of their doing.
    Many of them are on the influence of drugs or on the search for money to pay for their drug addiction. These persons are sick in their mind and must get a psychological therapy. They can have a normal life after 15 years prison instead of killing them.
    If the government kills a person (people=Volk) they swap the position with the offender which committed a murderer. They aren't better as a murder and act as an instrument of vengeance.
    Furthermore there is a high risk of killing an innocent person. Punishing a person to death mostly is a final decision, which can't be removed after initiating the death injection.

    Of course I can understand the wish for revenge by a mother of a murdered child but we can't use practices from the Middle Ages in our century.
    I think that a life in prison is more effective because it is for most people even harder to be in prison than to get killed by the law.
    It's not the way of a democratic nation to retaliate because that would mean to be on the same level like the offender.
    We can not rape a rapist or hurt someone in the case of injury, so why should we kill a murderer?

    Ich habe deinen Text noch ein bisschen überarbeitet und einige offensichtliche Grammatik- Fehler korrigiert. Trotzdem solltest du deinen Text noch einmal gründlich (auch den Inhalt) überdenken.
    LG
    Samantha

    Derselbe Text wurde auch bei e-hausi eingestellt; hier die dort vorgenommene Korrektur:
    This is going to be a comment on the question whether death penality is a necessary way of punishment in the 21. century.

    Many people are looking for total safety and accept [---] capital punishment as an alternate option to get rid of murderers and rapists.
    It is true that the hard punishment of govermental law is a warning for potential criminals but it is also fact that many murderers don`t calculate the consequences of their doings.
    Many of them are influenced by drugs or on the search for money to pay for their drug addiction. These persons are mentally ill and should get psychological therapy. They may, if not executed, lead a normal life after 15 years of imprisonment [---]
    If the goverment executes a person they swap the position with the offender who has commited a murder. They aren`t any better than a murdererwhen using the execution of the murderer as an instrument of vengeance.
    Furthermore there remains a high risk of executing an innocent person. Sentencing a person to death row is mostly a final decision which can`t be recalled after having set the lethal injection.

    Of course I can understand the wish for revenge by the mother of a murdered child. We can`t use practices from the middle ages in our century.
    I think that a life in prison is more effective and for most people even harder than legally killing them
    It`s not the way of a democratic nation to retaliate with the same means.. It would mean to be on the same level with the offender.
    We can not rape a rapist or hurt some one in the case of injury so why should we kill a murderer?

    Flo